Search This Blog

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Little Jim









Saturday, November 23, 2013

The Man Comes Around




Friday, November 22, 2013

Never Judge a County by its Judge

Never judge a county by its judge

Posted 
I’m not much for reading gloom-and-doom news stories. The words drugs, sexual assault and murder send my eyes roaming in search of other topics. Six out of seven days a week — when it comes to articles about crime — the headlines are enough for me.

I experienced one of those seventh days last week. The words “Two Mingo officials indicted by grand jury” lured me in. The name “Mingo” gets me every time. I spent my elementary school years in Williamson.

A circuit court judge named Thornsbury — Michael Thornsbury — is about to undergo a role reversal. He’ll get a view of the courtroom from below the bench when he goes on trial Oct. 15 for two counts of conspiracy.This is yet another blow to an area that, for years, has tried to escape its Hatfield and McCoys, “Bloody Mingo” reputation.

The now suspended judge is accused of plotting the undoing of his secretary’s husband. By the way, he and his secretary, Kim Woodruff, had been carrying on an affair.

She broke it off, and Thornsbury went to work on eliminating his competition. According to the indictment, the judge tried to plant drugs on Robert Woodruff’s car and, later, coerced a state trooper to file a false complaint for larceny.Thornsbury even placed his pal and business partner, Jarrod Fletcher, in charge of the grand jury to gather information on Woodruff through illegal subpoenas. Never mind that it’s against state law for an officeholder to serve on a grand jury. Fletcher is Mingo County’s director of Homeland Security.

I kept thinking I’d heard this story before. And I had. It’s all there in 2 Samuel: 11 and 12 — in this popular book called the Bible. Did the gallivanting judge learn nothing from King David?

David had the same kind of tunnel vision when it came to lusting after Bathsheba. His throne took a hit after he traipsed around with Uriah’s wife. Poor Uriah. He didn’t fare near as well as Woodruff.

The judge’s schemes took place between 2008-2012. Robert Woodruff probably wondered what he’d done to bring on such a stretch of bad luck. I imagine he was as shocked as he was relieved to discover someone had been framing him all along.

Like David before Bathsheba, Thornsbury — before Kim — lived a comfortable lifestyle by most people’s standards. The former assistant Mingo County prosecutor has served as a circuit judge since 1997. There is a woman who calls him “husband” and kids who call him “dad.” He has friends. Most have expressed their shock and disbelief.The real victims of Thornbury’s alleged actions are the good citizens of Mingo County. And there are plenty of them. Hardworking people who are proud of their roots.

 They wage a daily battle to overcome their county’s stereotype only to wake to gut-punching headlines.  All West Virginians — at one time or another — have waged similar wars.
The people of Mingo County gave me the gift of a magical childhood — one, if given the chance, I’d live all over again. An individual’s actions should never define an entire county — or state.

GBS Football


State vs. Mary Young




crtl Plus to enlarge

Video of the Big Yard Sale














Pocahontas Judge is Starting to Feel the Heat



A Tale of Two Judges



Rowe

Pomponio



Here's a theory as to why Judge Pomponio is trying to jump off a sinking ship:

First, He has hit his minimum retirement requirement

Second, with the investigation Donna started and Totten going to prison has given the investigation more creditability and “should” make other Information that was provided to the investigators more creditable.  Which make Donna look more credible and them (Sheriff, Rowe and Him) less.

Thirdly, he has to be feeling the heat from the investigation and Donna’s ODC complaint.  It was clear during her hearing, that he and the Sheriff over stepped their authority and professional relationship several times (breaking rules and laws). 


The target of course was Donna and in selective cases.  Pomponio was leading the charge against Donna because she instigated the investigation of Totten. 

They were targeting me because I had exposed Totten for the dirtbag that he was.  This can send even a Judge to prison.  Pomponio wants out before this investigation is over.  

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see Rowe resign!  He is in over his head on this one!!!!

Pomponio violated my civil rights when he appointed a special magistrate from Greenbrier County for the purpose of "signing a warrant."  He completely avoided the legal procedures mandated by state law.  He would have signed the warrant himself, but didn't!  He used the Greenbrier county mag as a monkey's paw to have me arrested.

Office Chris Cole, the felon from Kentucky, made the arrest along with Troy McCoy.

Fourth,  who knows… he may think if he retires that the Investigators will stop looking at his Wrongful acts and let him retire in peace…..


Fifth,  the Federal charges of Officials (including the Judge) in Mingo County is stressing all of them.  Just Once example is where they arrested you over the speeding charge.  They (sheriff & him) did not follow the correct procedures.  Bypassing the PA and Mag office in Pocahontas county.  This civil right violation was reinforce my Donna’s letters to both US Attorneys. Which should help me in my law suit or adjust it to include that incident.  What they did to me and others is WHAT got the Official in Mingo charged!


Pomponio is the one who signed a search warrant so that the Pocahontas County Sheriff's office could keep my computer stuff.  I have a federal suit in progress at this time.  Pomponio,  doubtless knows that he is headed to the witness stand.  He is scared that he is going down form a civil rights violation.

The Sheriff's Department had no right to arrest me after my case had been dismissed WITH PREJUDICE.  Their stupidity caused me to be injured and cost the county $10,000.  

It is time to reinvestigate the corruption in this county with an eye to the actions of BOTH JUDGES, NOT JUST POMPONIO.


WEST VIRGINIA JUDGE INDICTED AFTER TRYING TO LIVE OUT BAD NOIR MOVIE PLOT

It's Thornesbury, not ThornberryA West Virginia judge was indicted last Thursday on two charges of conspiracy after spending years trying to frame the husband of his former lover with a number of crimes. TheAP reports that the indictment against Mingo County Circuit Judge Michael Thornsbury alleges that he
tried between 2008 and 2012 to frame Robert Woodruff for crimes including drug possession, larceny and assault. The judge had been having an affair with his secretary — Woodruff’s wife, Kim — and he tried to eliminate the competition after she tried to break things off …



The schemes involved a state trooper, the county emergency services director and another man, the indictment says, but none of them panned out.
There is no word yet on whether the Coen Brothers have optioned the story.
Thornsbury tried several plots, all unsuccessful, to incriminate Woodruff. First he asked a friend to “plant a magnetic metal box containing drugs” on Woodruff’s vehicle, but the friend refused. Then he convinced a state trooper to file a false complaint of larceny against Woodruff for stealing from his employer, but the county prosecutor, who knew about Thornsbury’s affair, convinced the magistrate to drop the charges. Thornsbury arranged to have another friend, the county emergency services director, become the foreman of the grand jury so he could dig for private information on Woodruff. And finally, after Woodruff was assaulted last year, Thornsbury somehow managed to get Woodruff “identified as the perpetrator.” Again, the charges ended up getting dismissed. We’re betting a search of Thornsbury’s garage will also turn up a lot of defective equipment mail-ordered from the Acme company.
In addition to the Thornsbury case, the AP article details several other picturesque and colorful events in Mingo county, where in 1988 a former sheriff sold his office for $100,000 and in February of this year a woman serving on the grand jury was “charged with tipping people off about indictments.” The same day that Thornsbury was indicted, county commissioner Dave Baisden, in a separate case, was charged with “trying to buy tires for his personal vehicle at a government discount, then terminating the county’s contract with Appalachian Tire when it refused to cooperate.” Compared to Thornesbury, Baisden seems to lack initiative.
Judge Thornsbury is not without his supporters, including friend and restaurant owner Peirce Whitt, who doesn’t think Mingo County has a problem:
“It has nothing to do with Mingo County or the people in Mingo County,” he said. “We’re still the good people that we are.
“I’m sure if you go anyplace, you could find a bad person,” Whitt said. “And that’s not to say Judge Thornsbury is a bad person, because he hasn’t been proven guilty yet.”

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Corporate Welfare


Beautiful Women of 1968


1902 Fire in Marlinton


Homestead Exemption






Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Up the Country


Capture of Henry Cassady


A Case of Self Defense





Capture of Kellison


The Great Violinist of Williams River







More on Franklin and the Rainbow Murders

Tuesday November 19, 2013
Stay granted in execution for WV 'Rainbow Murders'
Advertiser
CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- A federal judge in Missouri granted a stay of execution Tuesday to white supremacist serial killer Joseph Paul Franklin, who confessed to the 1980 murders of two women in Pocahontas County.
Nanette Laughrey, U.S. District Court judge, cited concerns with a lawsuit brought by Franklin and 19 other death row inmates challenging the state's execution protocol. The 14-page ruling says the matter must be resolved before he is put to death.
It was still possible, however, that the Missouri Supreme Court could overturn the stay, which calls for the execution to happen any time today.
Franklin, 63, is a self-proclaimed "born killer" and took pride in being a neo-Nazi and white supremacist. He believed interracial marriages were a sin against God and took it upon himself to punish the guilty. He preferred sniper attacks and killed for sport.
Franklin was convicted and sentenced to two life sentences for the June 1980 killings of African-American teenagers Darrell Lane, 14, and Dante Brown, 13.
He has confessed to killing an interracial couple in Johnstown, Pa., and shooting and crippling Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt because of an interracial photo shoot.
In total, he is said to have killed at least 22 people between 1977 and 1980. All of the murders targeted minorities.
He has since recanted those beliefs in more recent interviews with CNN and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
On June 25, 1980, Franklin used a .44 caliber Ruger pistol to kill hitchhikers Nancy Santomero, 19, of New York, and Vicki Durian, 26, of Iowa. They were headed to a gathering of a back-to-nature group, the Rainbow Family, in the Monongahela Forest in Pocahontas County.
The Rainbow Family is a group of individuals committed to principles of nonviolence and world peace. They hold their annual festival in national parks.
Franklin confessed to the "Rainbow Murders" in 1997 to an Ohio assistant prosecutor, Melissa Powers, in the course of investigation in another case. Powers is currently a judge for the Hamilton County Municipal Court District 7 in Ohio.
In an exclusive interview with the Daily Mail, Powers described sitting down with Franklin on death row in Missouri in 1997.
Franklin was on Missouri's death row for killing 42-year-old Gerald Gordon in a sniper attack outside a suburban St. Louis synagogue in 1977.
"It was absolutely terrifying," Powers said. "I went from handling minor parking offenses to sitting in front of a monster responsible for killing dozens of innocent people. I was holding my breath and tried not to act like I was afraid."
Powers' boss asked her to help connect Franklin to the shooting deaths of the two Cincinnati boys.
For 17 years, Franklin refused to speak about the homicides. The Hamilton County, Ohio prosecutor's office decided to use Powers to lure Franklin into speaking.
"Joseph Franklin is a ladies man," Powers said. "I was one of a few females in the office so we all thought we may have a chance to get a confession if one of the females spoke to him. It worked."
Powers' main objective was to get a confession in the Cincinnati case. She never expected a slew of confessions to homicides spanning 10 states.
"What was interesting about Franklin is that he expressed no emotion when he described the murders," Powers said. "He was very flat and didn't feel bad ... he had it in his mind that he was justified in killing the victims. He claimed he had a purpose and a reason to kill.
"I looked into the face of evil. I was scared the whole time. He looked at me and said he could kill me before the guards could get here.
"It was definitely frightening."
Powers studied Franklin before the meeting, including FBI documents and other records. She learned that his mother was very abusive and that Franklin was deeply respectful of her.
Powers said Franklin wanted to go back to his cell following the confession.
"He looked at me and said, 'I want to set the record straight. I know someone else was convicted in the 'Rainbow Murders' case in West Virginia."
A few days later, Powers called Franklin and he confessed to killing the two hitchhikers in the wilderness at Briery Knob on Droop Mountain in Pocahontas County.
"I committed the Rainbow Murders, you know," Franklin told Powers. "The Rainbow killings were a little different ... cause I just picked them up hitchhiking."
"He went into great detail," Powers said. "It was definitely too much at times. He told me he killed the two women after one of them said she had a black boyfriend. I wasn't too familiar with the homicides in West Virginia so there was a lot of pressure to ask the right questions to aid in the investigation."
Following the "Rainbow Murders," rumors abounded, including one that a local had murdered the girls because residents of the rural community were angry that the Rainbow group had selected their area for the gathering.
In July 1982, 36-year-old Jacob Beard came under suspension because of some telephone calls he placed to Durian's parents. 
Beard was well known by most area residents. At the time, he worked at Greenbrier Tractor Sales in Lewisburg. He claimed he went to work and attended a school board meeting the day of the murders. 
Beard, however, became more suspicious when he began telling bizarre stories about the case, including one in which he claimed a third shooting victim was dumped into a corn chipper on his property.
Then-Prosecutor Walt Weiford told police that two men told him they saw Beard kill the women.
Beard, who had moved to Florida, was brought back in 1993 for a trial that ended in a guilty verdict. He was convicted in Greenbrier County (the case was moved there because of publicity).
Beard served nearly six years in federal prison before he was granted a new trial.
Pam Pritt, former executive editor of the Pocahontas Times, covered Beard's trials.
"The judge ruled that Franklin's confession could be used in the second trial," Pritt said. "The community was mixed-nearly half stood with Beard and half believed he was guilty. The trial was a big deal for Pocahontas County."
Prior to Beard's first trial, his lawyers sought to introduce the confession of Franklin, who at the time was serving three life sentences at a federal penitentiary in Marion, Illinois.
On March 1, 1984, Franklin told a Wisconsin Department of Justice officer he had killed two women in West Virginia and provided a hand-drawn map of the location. He later gave a similar statement to federal agents.
When State Police interviewed Franklin, he initially denied involvement, but then took responsibility and abruptly refused to talk further.
The trial judge barred the evidence as hearsay and unreliable and on June 4, 1993, Beard was sentenced to life without parole.
In 1995, the West Virginia Supreme Court affirmed the convictions, but remanded the case for a hearing to determine whether any of the evidence had been developed from leads Beard provided.
In 1996, a judge ruled that the evidence was properly obtained and the ruling was upheld by the Court of Appeals in 1998.
Lawyers for Beard then filed a petition for a state writ of habeas corpus. They presented a sworn deposition from Franklin saying he had killed the women.
In January 1999, the writ was granted and a new trial was ordered. Beard was released on bond.
A jury in Braxton County acquitted Beard on May 31, 2000. Beard later filed a wrongful conviction lawsuit against Pocahontas County authorities and in January 2003, agreed to a $2 million settlement.
Franklin has never been tried for the "Rainbow Murders."
Jerry Dale, former sheriff of Pocahontas County, was quoted in a 1999 Cincinnati Enquirer report as saying, "There's no doubt in my mind that Beard did it."
Franklin's confession hasn't changed his mind, he told the Daily Mail Tuesday.
"If you look at the forensic and ballistic evidence, it is not consistent with Franklin's statement," he said. "I've worked in prisons myself and I know how inmates work. There's a society within a society."
Franklin read about the murders in a true crime magazine, Dale said.
"He got the number of times the victims were shot wrong," he said. "The trajectory of the shots - nothing makes sense."
Beard was raised in the Pocahontas County community of Hillsboro. Dale knew Beard and, "if you look into his background there's a lot of Dr. Jekyll and Hyde stuff going on."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.       

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

1895 Farming Equipment






1895 Stoves





Fracking--From the Highland Voice



Exit Another Prosecutor



Breathing is Optional....

Our reporter has indicated that the fire in Marlinton is being allowed to burn itself out so that the amount of cleanup debris will be reduced through combustion.  We understand that this was approved by the fire marshal.    The Bank had to be pumped with fresh air to eliminate the stuffy air.  The asbestos won't travel in the wind, it is too heavy.  There may have been horsehair in the roofing. Keep the faith--fresh air is on the way!






Organized Crime and Child Protective Services--A Petition



 Family courts have simply become battlefields and it affects the whole family. We do not believe in sole custody by either parent when both parents are capable. Children deserve the right to be equally raised by both parents. 

Beginning about 1973, criminal elements in the mental health and social work professions began cooperating to construct an organized criminal enterprise that exploits children behind the legislated secrecy of the child protection, juvenile justice, and mental health systems. 

The contemporary end result is a nationwide organized criminal operation that uses everything from sophisticated science-fraud-based "evaluation" instruments structured to produce false positives to third party state service contracts written to sustain a system of structural corruption in which state employees and contract service providers must falsify records and testimony or they will not continue to be employed or paid. 

To maintain their existence, organized criminal operations must construct management bureaucracies with policies and procedures necessary to sustain daily operations, just like any other bureaucracy. The only adaptation required to run criminal operations in the government and quasi-government agencies which constitute the child protection system is that they must be integrated into the policies and procedures of the umbrella agency and not be detected as components of a criminal bureaucracy. 

The existence of organized crime in the child protection system of any given state is not that difficult to detect. Prominent among the indicators are: 

(1) The annual number of founded child abuse allegations can be predicted from the number of conditional federal grant and reimbursement salary fund dollars needed to balance the state child protection agency payroll (the number of children taken into state custody each year will be the number sufficient to generate the federal fund claims necessary to balance the agency payroll); and 

(2) Third party contracts to file state child protection agency federal fund claims will contain provisions that only compensate the contractor for increases in federal funds paid to the state over and above the amount paid in the previous contract for such claim filing services. The latter creates a system that will only result in compensation to the contractor if the number of children taken into state custody constantly increases and/or the total claims generated from each child in state custody increases each contract cycle. The net result is a system in which everyone stays employed only if the number of founded child abuse cases and children taken into state custody always increases and never decreases. An important byproduct of this criminal process of exploiting children independent of the true child abuse rate is the blind political support for the criminal operations generated by the constant flow of conditional federal funds into the respective State's economy. 

There are similar lessons to be drawn from the embarrassment of the Bush Administration over numerous ignored warnings that Osama bin Laden planned to hijack planes and fly them into buildings and the embarrassment of Florida Officials having to explain fifteen months of falsified child protection records, sworn court testimony that Rilya Wilson was in Florida State custody and doing fine, and falsified federal fund claims for services delivered to a child that may have been dead the entire time. 

After the collapse of the World Trade Center, both the American Public and terrorists worldwide now know the United States is vulnerable to attack, due in large part to corruption, incompetence and mismanagement in intelligence and law enforcement agencies. 

By signing this petition, you agree that there needs to be a reform in the Child Protective Services, Child Support Enforcement Agency, Juvenile Courts and mental health facilities. The basis of this petition starts in Summit County, Ohio and throughout the United States of America. This petition will be sent to the United States Congress. 

-Kidnapped for Profit: The Truth About CPS

Kidnapping Kids for Profit































The Rainbow Murders in Full

Comments Enabled at Bottom



Jacob Beard

In the summer of 1980, 19-year-old Nancy Santomero of Huntington, New York, and 26-year-old Vicki Durian of Wellman, Iowa, set off from Durian’s parents’ home to hitchhike to Monongahela National Park in southeast West Virginia for a gathering of the “Rainbow Family.”

The Rainbow Family is a group of individuals committed to principles of non-violence and world peace who hold annual festivals around the country in national parks at the beginning of July.

Their bodies were found about 9 p.m. on June 25, 1980 near Droop Mountain Park in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, by a student who was walking to a lean-to where he lived on Briery Knob. Both had been shot to death and the coroner estimated they had been dead for three hours or less.

Both victims carried no identification and remained unidentified for several days. 

Santomero’s sister, Kathy, who traveled to the Rainbow gathering from her home in New York, had expected to meet her sister. When Nancy did not show up, Kathy assumed she had decided not to come and on July 5 Nancy drove back to the New York. When she arrived, a friend pointed out a newspaper article with photographs of the victims, one of which appeared to be her sister. She drove back to West Virginia and on July 8 identified her sister’s body and helped police contact the Durian family.

The murders remained unsolved for two years. Rumors abounded, including one that a local had murdered the girls because of residents were angry that the Rainbow group had selected their area for their gathering. Many residents in the rural county were upset at what they believed would be a gathering of drug-indulging hippies. The investigation was complicated by the tight-lipped attitude of residents who lived in an area where everyone knew everyone else.

In July 1982, 36-year-old Jacob Beard came under suspicion because of some telephone calls he placed to Durian’s parents. After the first call, in which the caller refused to identify himself, a tap was placed on the Durian telephone and as a result, Beard was identified as the caller when he made a second call, during which he said the police were not doing their job and that he was not the murderer.

Beard was a larger than life figure—and physically imposing at more than 250 pounds—who was well known by most of the area residents. At the time, he was facing animal cruelty charges for allegedly killing his former girlfriend’s cat and leaving it on her bed. Authorities agreed to dismiss the cruelty charges in return for Beard’s cooperation. They granted Beard him immunity for any “after-the-fact” involvement he may have had, but denied him immunity for involvement as a principal or accessory.

Beard told police said that he worked at Greenbrier Tractor Sales on the day of the murders until 1 p.m. and then went out in the field to work for a customer. He stopped by a grocery store on his way home around 5:15 p.m., and then he and his wife attended a school board meeting at 7 p.m. He said he returned home around 9 p.m.

He said that on his way home, he saw the vehicle of a local resident, Christine Cook, near the entrance to Droop Mountain Park along with Paulmer Adkison and McCoy and two women who may have been the Rainbow women.

Police questioned Cook and she denied being near the park.

Beard then told police that another Rainbow member had been killed in September 1980—three months after Santomero and Durian were murdered. Beard said that Adkison and Arnold Cutlip killed the woman and brought the body to his property where they disposed of it by putting it into Beard’s corn chopper. Police investigated and ultimately determined Beard’s account was a hoax, although Cutlip was arrested and held for two months before being released.

In 1983, Lee Morrison, an area resident, went to the sheriff in neighboring Greenbrier County and said he and a man named Gerald Brown had picked up the women when they were hitch hiking and that after drinking for a while, he passed out. He said that when he awoke, he found himself in the van on Briery Knob. He said he saw Brown kill both women and that he helped move the bodies to the edge of a field on the orders of Brown.

Brown was arrested and charged with the murders, but at a preliminary hearing, Morrison recanted. He said he had been put up to making the statement by Beard. Morrison said that Beard told him something would happen to his family if he didn’t make the statement. The charges against Brown were dismissed and he was released.

In 1985, a Pocahontas County sheriff’s deputy made a note in the file regarding a local resident named Alice Roberts and that she should be interviewed, but the interview never took place.

The investigation then went dormant for the next several years. In 1991, the area’s top law enforcement officials decided to renew the investigation.

In reviewing the case file, they found the note about Alice Roberts and followed it up. Roberts referred officers to her daughter, Pam Wilson, who said that on the day of the murders of Santomero and Durian, she saw two “hippie-type” women get into a van driven by Richard Fowler, a local resident whom she knew. She said she saw McCoy with Winters Walton and Fowler that afternoon.

In November 1991, a man serving a 10-year prison term for forgery and auto theft reached out to police hoping to trade information about the case for better prison conditions. The man, Keith Cohenour, said that on the day the women were murdered, he drove into a tavern parking lot in Hillsboro, West Virginia, and walked past a van owned by Richard Fowler.

Cohenour said he heard Fowler inside the van arguing with McCoy. McCoy, he said, told Fowler, “I’m not going to spend the rest of my life behind bars for Jake Beard or no one else.” Fowler replied that if Beard found out he was saying those things, “you’ll wind up in the same place those girls are.”

Cohenour said he and Fowler and McCoy met several hours later at a trailer owned by Gerald Brown lived. Cohenour said that Brown and Jacob Beard were arguing and that Beard was telling Brown to keep his mouth shut. Beard then told McCoy that if he didn’t keep his mouth shut he would “end up on Briery Knob, too.”

Later that night, according to Cohenour, he gave McCoy a ride home and McCoy confessed that he saw Beard shoot the women.

The investigation intensified and other witnesses were located. Steve Good reported seeing Fowler’s van at Brown’s home at about 6 p.m. on the night of the murders. He said the van was backed into the Brown residence and that the van was being hosed out.

William Scott told police he saw Beard driving at a high rate of speed out of Droop Mountain Park about 3:30 or 3:45 p.m. on the date of the crime. Another witness said she saw Beard’s vehicle, but not him, at the entrance to the park between 5:30 and 6 p.m.
Authorities ultimately brought murder charges on April 16, 1992 against Beard, McCoy, Fowler, Brown and three other men, Winters Walton, Arnold Cutlip and Johnnie Lewis.
Police said that Lewis and Walton had implicated Beard as the killer.

At a pre-trial hearing, Walton claimed he was physically threatened by police—that one officer put his foot on the back of Walton’s neck at one point. Following allegations of police misconduct and questions about Lewis’s credibility—he had recanted his identification of Beard five separate times to his lawyer—authorities voluntarily dismissed the charges.

On January 13, 1993, Beard, McCoy, Fowler, Brown and Cutlip were indicted again for the murders. Walton and Lewis were not charged—both had been granted immunity in exchange for their testimony implicating the other five in the murders.

On April 16, 1993, Beard was arrested in Crescent City, Florida, where he had moved and was working as a service manager at a car dealership.

Prior to trial, Beard’s lawyers sought to introduce the confession of Joseph Paul Franklin, a convicted serial killer serving three life sentences at a federal penitentiary in Marion, Illinois. On March 1, 1984, Franklin told a Wisconsin Department of Justice officer that he had killed two white women in West Virginia and provided a hand-drawn map of the location. He later gave a similar statement to federal agents. When he was interviewed by West Virginia state police, Franklin initially denied involvement in the murders, then took responsibility and then abruptly refused to talk further.

The trial judge barred the evidence as hearsay and unreliable.

Beard went on trial alone—without the codefendants—in the summer of 1993 in Greenbrier County, where the case was moved due to the publicity about the murders.
Pamela Wilson told the jury that that she saw the women walking along Route 219, a two-lane road between a cattle farm and the unincorporated village of Hillsboro. She said she saw Fowler, accompanied by Walton and McCoy, drive up to the victims in his van and both women got in.

Walton testified that they picked them up because they believed they were hippies and probably would engage in sex. Walton said they told the women they had to go to their boss’s house to pick up a paycheck and they drove to Brown’s trailer. There, they all had some drinks and someone brought out some marijuana, he said.
Then they drove to Droop Mountain Park where they stopped amidst other vehicles where people were drinking and hanging out. The men began plotting to get the women alone and someone suggested going to Briery Knob—which was on the way to where the Rainbow gathering was to be held.

Walton said that when the road turned to a dirt road and the area became more remote, the women began arguing with McCoy, saying the men were not taking them to their destination and they threatened to call police. The van stopped halfway up Briery Knob and that’s where the group was joined by Beard, Brown, Lewis and Cutlip, who had a trailer nearby, Walton said.

Walton said the women were upset and that McCoy brandished a pistol. That’s when Beard opened fire, Walton said. Durian was shot first and Santomero was cut down as she tried to run away.

Walton said they loaded the bodies into the van, drove further up the hill and dumped them into a field. Their identification was taken away and destroyed, he said.

Lewis, despite his recantations, testified that he saw Beard kill Santomero and Durian.
Cohenour also testified to the statement he gave more than a decade earlier implicating Beard, Fowler, Brown and McCoy.

Christine Cook, who years earlier had denied being at Droop Mountain Park, now testified that she saw McCoy, Fowler, Cutlip, Lewis, and Brown at the park, possibly as late as 5 p.m. She said it was possible that Beard was among them.

The chief medical examiner, who had originally estimated the time of death as about 7 p.m., based on the condition of the victims’ bodies—rigor mortis had not set in when they were discovered about 9 p.m.—testified that the murder could have been committed as early as 4 p.m.

Beard testified in his own defense and provided his time card from his job at a farm implement business showing he checked in the morning of the crime on the company time clock and that he penciled in his time off work—a common practice at the company—as 5:15 p.m. He conceded that he did not write in the time until a week later.

He said that on his way home, he stopped at a store, and then went home where he picked up his wife and both went to the school board meeting. Other witnesses at the board meeting testified that he was in attendance at the meeting.

On June 4, 1993, a jury convicted Beard of both murders and he was sentenced to life in prison without parole. The prosecution then dismissed the charges against the remaining defendants and they were never prosecuted again.

In 1995, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed the convictions, but remanded the case for a hearing to determine whether any of the prosecution evidence had been developed from leads Beard provided after being granted limited immunity.

In 1996, a judge ruled that the evidence was properly obtained and the ruling was upheld by the Court of Appeals in 1998.

Lawyers for Beard then filed a petition for a state writ of habeas corpus. They presented a sworn deposition from Joseph Paul Franklin saying he had killed the women. They also presented testimony from Cutlip, saying that he had been with Lewis on the day of the murders and they did not see Beard.

In January 1999, the writ was granted, the conviction was vacated and a new trial was ordered. Beard was released on bond.

Beard went on trial for a second time in May 2000 in Braxton County—another change of venue due to publicity about the case.

Beard again testified in his own behalf and presented his alibi. The defense presented the deposition of Franklin as well as Cutlip’s testimony that rebutted Lewis’s testimony.

After less than three hours of deliberation, the jury acquitted Beard on May 31, 2000.
Beard later filed a wrongful conviction lawsuit against Pocahontas County police and in January 2003, agreed to a $2 million settlement.
– Maurice Possley


About Me

A local archivist who specializes in all things Pocahontas County