Statement of John Leyzorek to Pocahontas County Commission
Meeting 14 3 16 in re Atlantic Coast Pipeline.
Thank you, Commissioners, for
accepting my comment in this form.
You formerly gave your support for this proposed project on
its originally proposed route through National Forest North of Durbin, in the
form of a letter to the FERC.
The National Forest decided the project was too destructive
of their land to permit it to pass, so ACP proposed a new route which transfers
the destruction a few miles South, mostly to private land.
As all are aware,
this has created a small storm of objections, from many directions..
At your last meeting,
you three appropriately responded by orally expressing opposition to the new
route,
HOWEVER none of you would make a
formal motion to express your opposition in the concrete and effective form of
a new letter to Dominion and/or FERC.Before renewing that request I would like
to add two thoughts to the discussion.
I went to the informational meeting at Snowshoe put on by
Dominion last week, and looking at the map of the entire proposed route, I
noticed that the route basically runs South-east from its origin in Lewis or
Harrison County, crossing here and in our neighboring counties some of the most
rugged terrain in the Eastern US, meeting an existing pipeline near
Northhampton which goes to the port of Newport News, before turning South in
Eastern Virginia toward its terminus in
Robeson County.
So, the route looks like an upside-down letter
"L". Now if that "L"
were to be turned right side up, making its Southward travel first before
turning East, the total distance would be the same, but the terrain traversed
would be hugely easier, less dangerous and expensive to cross.
So one may ask,
why the more difficult, dangerous, and expensive route?
The obvious answer
is, that the real destination of this pipe is its connection with the existing
pipe to Newport News, from which the gas can be exported to a more profitable
market
There is already a liquefaction plant nearby. and, as I have said
before, it will be the legal obligation of the pipeline operator to its
stockholders to export the gas if it is more profitable to do so, regardless of
any existing supposed contracts which Dominion had drummed up to deceive FERC
that this is a project with value to the American public.
So, that is my first point, the proposed route as well as
the realities of law and markets all tell us that this project is a fraud on
the public.
My second point is that the Forest Service refused to allow
it to cross their land, fearing its destructiveness......and their voice was
listened to.
.If some new future route crosses my land, or yours, and we
are similarly concerned, will our voice be as loud in Dominion's or FERC's ears
as the Monongahela national Forest's was?
Alas, probably not.
Furthermore, I hear the proposed route has already changed
again, to avoid the entrance to the Snowshoe Resort. Some folks will breathe a sigh of relief, to
others the nightmare is now knocking on their door.
I do not believe this high-frequency dance is an accident,
but a stratagem by Dominion to create a moving target, to confuse and exhaust
us. There is no doubt that wherever is
might be built, it would permanently compromise and disfigure the land, forever
foreclosing numerous productive, delightful, and sustainable uses.
So, we citizens and
private landowners must look to you, our County Commission ,
to be our loud voice for the protection of our land, and must ask you not only
to oppose one particular newish not so Northerly route , but to re-think your original position, and absolutely oppose ANY
route through ANY of Pocahontas County.Thank you
John I tend to agree with you about the final destination. I think there isxa huge market in eastern europe that American companys and certain political figures want part of that the Russians fill now.
ReplyDeleteBut talking to our CC is a waste if breath. Look at thier advisors and the decisions thry have made already.
The Road Runner...