Search This Blog

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Heinemann's Appendix

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
AT CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA


CHARLOTTE W. ELZA, and
JEROME E. HEINEMANN,
                        Petitioners / Appellants,


Vs. ) Nos. 13-1182 and 13-1183                                                       


POCAHONTAS COUNTY SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY,
                        Respondent / Appellee.



PETITIONERS / APPELLANTS
APPENDIX RECORD
Volume 1 of Number 1

Table of Contents
&
All Referenced Documents

Bifurcated from Petitioners / Appellants
John Leyzorek, No. 13-1160, and Douglas H. Bernier, No. 13-1161
Pursuant to ORDER dated 03 January 2014



PETITIONER’S APPENDIX RECORD
Volume 1 of Number 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Exhibit 1    >       Certified copy of complete Docket Sheet from 29 June
[A.R .01 - A.R. 29]                   2007 to 30 December 2013…………………………...5, 10, 13, 14


Exhibit 2     >        13 October 2013, Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion
[A.R. 30 - A.R. 42]           for Summary Judgment…………………………………..……13


Exhibit 3     >         15 October 2013, Defendant Heinemann: Correction of
[A.R. 43 - A.R. 49]            Plaintiff’s Proposed Order for Summary Judgment……...…13


Exhibit 4     >         13 March 2013, Order denying Defendants’ motions from
[A.R. 50 – A.R. 52]            hearing held on 12 December 2012………………………....7, 13


Exhibit 5     >          12 December 2012, Transcript of Hearing…………7, 10, 13, 14
[A.R. 53 – A.R. 74]

Exhibit 6     >           05 December 2012, Defendant Heinemann: Motion
[A.R. 75 – A.R. 79]                     to Dismiss………………………………………………..…..8, 13


Exhibit 7     >           27 December 2012, Defendant Heinemann: Response to
[A.R. 80 – A.R. 112]                   Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Why It
                                  Is Premature……………………………………………...6, 8, 13 

Exhibit 8     >           29 October 2013, Defendant Heinemann: Amended
[A.R. 113 – A.R. 117]                 Motion for New Trial………………………………..……..8, 13

Exhibit 9     >           23 January 2014, sample of Demand Letter from PCSWA
[A.R. 118 – A.R. 120]           regarding  Abstract of Judgment Lien placed upon a
                                  property-owner confined to a nursing home pursuant to

                                  having a stroke………………………………………………5, 11

1 comment:

  1. I heard that they had to remove his appendix and his gall bladder.

    ReplyDelete

We are making comments available again! You are free to express your First Amendment Rights Here!

About Me

A local archivist who specializes in all things Pocahontas County