IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST
VIRGINIA
AT CHARLESTON ,
WEST VIRGINIA
CHARLOTTE W. ELZA,
and
JEROME E. HEINEMANN,
Petitioners /
Appellants,
Vs. ) Nos. 13-1182
and 13-1183
Respondent / Appellee.
PETITIONERS / APPELLANTS
APPENDIX RECORD
Volume 1 of Number 1
Table of Contents
&
All Referenced Documents
Bifurcated from Petitioners / Appellants
John Leyzorek, No. 13-1160, and Douglas H. Bernier, No. 13-1161
Pursuant to ORDER dated 03 January 2014
PETITIONER’S APPENDIX RECORD
Volume 1 of Number 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Exhibit 1 > Certified copy of complete Docket Sheet
from 29 June
[A.R .01 - A.R. 29] 2007
to 30 December 2013…………………………...5, 10, 13, 14
Exhibit 2 >
13 October 2013, Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion
[A.R. 30 - A.R. 42] for Summary Judgment…………………………………..……13
Exhibit 3
> 15 October 2013, Defendant
Heinemann: Correction of
[A.R. 43 - A.R. 49] Plaintiff’s Proposed Order for
Summary Judgment……...…13
Exhibit 4
> 13 March 2013, Order
denying Defendants’ motions from
[A.R. 50 – A.R. 52] hearing held on 12 December
2012………………………....7, 13
Exhibit 5
> 12 December 2012,
Transcript of Hearing…………7, 10, 13, 14
[A.R. 53 – A.R. 74]
Exhibit 6
> 05 December 2012,
Defendant Heinemann: Motion
[A.R. 75 – A.R. 79] to Dismiss………………………………………………..…..8,
13
Exhibit 7
> 27 December 2012, Defendant Heinemann:
Response to
[A.R. 80 – A.R. 112] Plaintiff’s
Motion for Summary Judgment and Why It
Is
Premature……………………………………………...6, 8, 13
Exhibit 8
> 29 October 2013,
Defendant Heinemann: Amended
[A.R. 113 – A.R. 117] Motion for
New Trial………………………………..……..8, 13
Exhibit 9
> 23 January 2014,
sample of Demand Letter from PCSWA
[A.R. 118 – A.R. 120] regarding Abstract of Judgment Lien placed upon a
property-owner confined to a nursing home pursuant to
having a
stroke………………………………………………5, 11
I heard that they had to remove his appendix and his gall bladder.
ReplyDelete