Search This Blog
Tuesday, June 17, 2014
Time to Answer
hi norm,
I just posted the below as a comment to the new blog topic on totten.
I had to whittle it down some to fit within the # of accepted characters allowed.
you may also want to post it as a separate comment as this is a big-time issue.
I will try to go back and and find these documents- u had posted them way back when posting stuff on the totten issue.
you may also want to look for them as these actions of jonese are very telling as to his "intent to cooperate" with the investigation.
he most likely snubbed off the feds and state police too.
juxtaposed jonese is going to be facing some significant grilling during his upcoming depositions.
they will have a well developed timeline that he will have a hard time squirming out of this time.
ditto for rotten's other corrupt cop colleagues and many others in the community that have been added to the witness list.
what needs further investigation is the initial actions of jonese "cooperating with the investigation" in depositions two years ago.
jonese's female lawyer coordinated with the other lawyers and scheduled him for a sworn deposition.
jonese was a complete NO SHOW.
jonese must have forgotten to wear his watch that day and somehow conveniently forgot that he was scheduled.
the other lawyers were flummoxed, stymied and scratching their heads as they had many questions to ask the supreme sheriff of the loco poco forest.
so, the lawyers called the sheriffs office looking for jonese.
jonese was no where to be found.
his corrupt underlings at the pcsd had been instructed to state that he was out of the office and "on official business".
jonese could not be reached on the radio or phone.
imagine that!
the lawyers were steamed and the billable hours continued to crank with no word from jonese.
jonese was wasting everyones time and had failed to show for a deposition that he told his female lawyer that he would show up for.
jonese's own female lawyer inquired with him on his whereabouts and his no show.
the documents indicate that JONESE PULLED A DOUBLE-CROSS ON ALL THE LAWYERS, including his own female lawyer.
jonese stated that "HIS PERSONAL LAWYER" (NOT HIS FEMALE LAWYER) had directed him TO NOT SHOW UP FOR THE SWORN DEPOSITION.
nobody knows who "his personal lawyer" is as jonese refused to identify who this 2nd lawyer is.
jonese didn't need the advice of a second "personal" lawyer--- as he was being given legal counsel, representation and defense from his female lawyer.........and yet wasting her time and essentially spitting in her face and making her look like an idiot front of the other lawyers.
all of this was shown in documents on this blog that was posted a long time back by the fat man.
so, the lawyers will remember all of jonese's actions and his contempt for their time when they place him in the hot seat.
his female lawyer will also want to save face and embarrassment and will no doubt make sure that our "good sheriff" makes his scheduled appointment for his sworn deposition.
she will be wanting to grab her client by the injun' ear and personally drag him in to make damn sure that he shows up this time around.
note the pathological pattern of conduct of our fine sheriff. his "personal lawyer" was never identified when jonese was asked to identify him.
remember the video footage that jonese posted on his facebook page relating to donna price and the election?
when grilled by the cc and saffer, jonese REFUSED to answer WHO put the video on his facebook page.
he hemmed and hawed, yet never answered the question and it still remains a mystery to this day.
jonese may very well try to pull this again during his upcoming depositions.
the lawyers aren't going to be in any mood to play childish half-ass games with the "good sheriff".
if he doesn't want to answer their questions, they will be more that glad to schedule a hearing in court whereby he will be REQUIRED to answer.
if jonese continues to play games, THE JUDGE WILL DEMAND THAT JONESE ANSWER .
IF JONESE REFUSES, THE JUDGE WILL FIND HIM IN CONTEMPT AND SEND HIS INJUSTICE INJUN' FANNY STRAIGHT TO JAIL.
the truth, spin, and lies are all about to catch up with jonese.
meanwhile, the feds and state police will be watching all of this with baited breath.
obstruction of justice charges, amongst many others, may very well be on the horizon for our "good sheriff".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About Me
- Norman Alderman
- A local archivist who specializes in all things Pocahontas County
below is the verbal shootout between jonese and saffer;
ReplyDeletejonese states that he "answers to the public, not martin saffer".
jonese will soon have to answer to the lawyers about his knowledge, incompetence, actions, and inactions regarding his inability to police his own department and protect the public.
someday soon the "good sheriff" may very well have to answer to booth goodwin at the u.s. attorneys office , the federal boys and the state police when they come a knockin' and looking to ask some random questions.
then, shortly thereafter, jonese may finally answer to the public-----------in a federal court of law........... far far away from his comfortably controlled confines of the loco poco forest.
http://www.alleghenymountainradio.org/pocahontas-commission-files-ethics-inquiry-for-sheriffs-department-video/
first off that is sir dreama`s job ,cover and lie for the big liar,her boss ......since he is paid by john q public it should be public knowledge what official duties he had that day ........the second lawyer is none other than the big,big drunk beer can bob.......i am sure the general feeling at the court house is that unfortunately they could not keep totten out of jail,so justice has been done lets put it all to bed ......let it all simply go away,it was all just a sordid affair anyway ........
ReplyDeleteif you think long and hard about it, jonese was more than likely personally grooming totten to be the future sheriff of the loco poco forest.
ReplyDeleteoff all the deputies, why did jonese personally select rotten for promotion to lieutenant?
of all the deputies, why did jonese personally select rotten to attend the fbi national academy?
if rotten was the cream of the crop, what does that say about the content and character of the other deputies and the department?
the lawyers will be asking these questions and many more-----and fully demonstrate through many witnesses and documents, that jonese knew exactly what was going on.
after jonese had personal and professional knowledge of rotten's perversions and proclivities, why did any of the above actions take place???
it is already well documented that jonese was aware of the issues with totten AS SOON AS HE TOOK OFFICE.
even the fat man once had high hopes and endorsed and regaled jonese as the marine man to come in and clean up the sheriffs office and the county.
people went to jonese with information and were seeking help for the citizens of pocahontas county, all to no avail as it fell on the doorsteps of the new sheriffs office and was somehow swept aside with disdain.
of course, wv law states that only the chief deputy in the sheriffs department is eligible to run for sheriff in an election.
chief deputy diamond dave walton has reached the end of his career with over 25 years of service and most likely will soon be retiring.
with walton on the way out the door, chief deputy was the next reserved promotional career spot for rotten.
jonese is also well aware of these facts and was most likely grooming rotten with career opportunities and moves that would make him sheriff in the next 5-10 years.
that's one hell of a scary thought.--- can you imagine rotten as the sheriff of pocahontas???
lastly, why would jonese lash out and personally and professionally attack the prosecuting attorney........who was only doing her job in reporting rotten's crimes to federal authorities when it became abundantly clear that no local law enforcement would ever be addressing the situation.
I wonder woman the private lawyer is.
ReplyDeleteReally hard to figure out.
I just hope Dave keeps asking his advice as we might get two birds with one stone.
Odd how Dave seems to not want to answer questions, I wonder if that same lawyer told him not to tell who posted the Donna tape on face book.
You know if that private no name lawyer was running against Donna that might create a aspect We have not considered.
The Road Runner......
Who wants a can of beer.....
that no name beer bong lawyer DID run against donna.
Deletedonna trounced him in the primary election.
it was then that geriatric gene stepped in as an "independent" and got on the ballot at the last minute.
geriatric gene then allowed beer bong bob in the back door of the prosecutors office by hiring him as his underling..........all while facing criminal charges of his own.
remember the statement and request of judge rowe.
ReplyDelete"we need more victims to come forward so that there can be more arrests of other cops".
meanwhile, jonese is trying to figure out what a cop is.
what has he done to stem the tide or further the investigations within the pcsd of other corrupt cops???
the county commission should be demanding answers from the sheriffs department for the protection of the citizens of pocahontas county.
the pcsd couldn't give a rats azz about the safety of the general public....or prepubescent girls.......or any other targeted women of the county.
is it time for the "good sheriff" to bring in the raleigh county sheriffs department again to conduct an internal audit.
its high time for the feds and state police to step in and bring an end to all this mischief, crimes, and nonsense.
never did find out why jamie walker got arrested a couple months back,or what happened to the case.........what price did jamie pay to get out of it ?????what was the price ????? i imagine jamie is as big a ball less wonder as the out going david march fleming .......they will not rock the boat no matter what ........well fleming got knocked out of the box ,so if jamie is just along for the ride ,he should be next to go .........having a special needs person,who just happens to be a bear hunter for commissioner just does not cut it .......balls and action is what is now needed ......wonder if walker has a daughter ?????? we know fleming has a daughter,but he is to gutless to connect the dots ,cause he sold out on the alderman raid .........
DeleteMaybe if he wears his Indain Joe costume to all of his hearing depositions and court in all the civil cases where he's being sued it will impress the court, he can grunt and say me no know, no speakad. English.
ReplyDeleteI hope he keeps taking advice from who ever his half witted private lawyer is.
ReplyDeleteUsually when one tells you to not answer or talk it's cause they fear you will cook your own goose, in this case the attorney my fear his own goose being cooked in a beer glazed sauce of conflict of interest.
his female lawyer has filed multiple documents with his answer of 'pleading the 5th' to nearly every question.............exceedingly similar to rotten's early paperwork proceedings.
Deleteanother question to ask- why would anyone hire two different lawyers with conflicting legal opinions and advice to their client???
ReplyDeletewhich begs another question- who is paying for all these lawyers???
most people have a hard time scrounging up the coin to afford even one lawyer.
our "good sheriff" doesn't make that much money and is not a wealthy man.
so, how can he afford the two lawyers?
additionally, lawyers don't want any client that is going to backbite their legal advice and representation while they are in the act of providing it.
his female lawyer would be wise to draw up a new contract for this go-round of depositions to make sure that jonese isn't seeking the counsel of any other attorney.
aunt peggy got deep pockets,maybe he has bullshitted her up enough to cough up some more money for his sorry ass
Deleteif the sheriff has nothing to hide what is his problem ,only a pathological liar would run around like a little girl and hide behind his ,"private lawyer"advising him to evade a deposition.......that is not what innocent people do in a court procedure ,only very guilty people behave this way .......certainly a big tough virile marine would not act like this unless he was guilty of perjury ,and obstruction of justice........if he does not cooperate fully in this matter ,the county commissioners need to demand his immediate removal from office........ the man is a disgrace and an impediment to justice being served ....... when jonese is removed the commission should appoint reverend norman alderman to take over the sheriffs department,now that is a guy who would qualify to commence a long over due house cleaning ,so badly needed ,for so very long a time .........what a case of humility would descend over everyone who works at the court house .......wouldn`t you love to see reverend alderman challenge diamond dave walton to a pie eating contest .......of course i am sure norman would continue to retain the consultant services of cheryl jonese at $35.00 per hour ......at least then we would find out what qualifications she has and in what field she has them in to warrant those fees,or would a warrant be issued for her scam as a fraud ...
ReplyDeleteHey let's hope he keeps taking advice from his private mouh peice.
DeleteAnd if it's who I think it is the court will explode. It could result in sanctions.
We might get lucky and see Totten reunited with several f his old buddies.
Picky might fill up the protective custody of the big house.
By the way can you repeat the story where you served papers on the born to be a warrior and he did the old duck and weave hiding from you like a kid trying to keep daddy from spanking him. I really want to hear it again.
The sheriff's female lawyer is none other than Donna Price; strange twist, eh?
ReplyDeleteWRONG!!! nice try, though.
Deleteincidentally, if that were true...........jonese would then have 3 lawyers........as donna is required to be supervised by another local attorney for the next 3 years.
No it can't be .
Deletejonese's female lawyer is from the shining city on the river, not the hole in the wall on the river;
Delete"Defended public and private employers in intricate employment cases involving allegations of sexual harassment and hostile work environment"
http://www.steptoe-johnson.com/attorneys/joanna-i-tabit
If he keeps refusing to tell who the second one is he will need a probation officer for guidance.
ReplyDeleteIf I was his female lawyer I'd say good luck let the mystery lawyer keep you out of trouble and the can.
Really is to bad in court you can't hook them all up to a polygraph.
ReplyDeleteBoth sides it would cut down wasting the courts time.
Of course in most cases neither side would like that.