Download and Print
Monday, July 20, 2015
Sunday, July 19, 2015
Thursday, July 16, 2015
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
Fire Fee
Lewisburg-area residents protest fire fee proposal
0
Posted: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 4:34 pm
LEWISBURG — "Taxation without representation" was the main rallying cry of landowners who raised objections to a proposed rural fire service fee at Tuesday's city council meeting.
If the fee is adopted, it will be levied against owners of property located in the Lewisburg Volunteer Fire Department's "first due" area, outside the city limits but within the state-established area that the fire company is required to serve. City residents already pay fees that support the LVFD's operations.
An ordinance establishing the rural fee, which quietly passed a first reading in April, was met on Tuesday with a small but vocal contingent of property owners whose outlying neighborhoods will be required to shoulder as much as 44 percent of the Lewisburg Fire Department's projected budget, if the fee is adopted.
Currently, the city finances nearly 83 percent ($388,548) of the LVFD's cost of operation, which the 2014 annual report shows totaled $469,858. The balance of the department's 2014 revenue came from donations and a state insurance surtax.
If everyone in the first due area paid the designated amount of the proposed rural fire fee for their property, Fire Chief Wayne Pennington said the revenue from those fees would total another $370,500.
If all other revenue streams hold steady, the additional revenue from the rural fire fee would push LVFD's budget over the $800,000 mark. Although that figure wasn't at the top of the list of the property owners' dissatisfaction with the proposed fees, several people Tuesday complained that it was "a lot of money."
Richlands resident Jack Tuckwiller asked why the VFD answers so many medical assistance calls, noting that 318 out of the department's 774 responses in 2014 were categorized as assistance for EMS crews.
Pennington said those calls often involve "life-threatening situations," and the VFD has the staff and equipment to get to the scene quickly and thereby save lives.
Tuckwiller also questioned the amount of the fees that will, presumably, be assessed against property owners like him on the western edge of Lewisburg's first due area, when a map Pennington displayed showed the majority of calls come from the north-south Route 219 corridor.
Another Fire Fee Goes to Illegal Fire Fee Heaven
WSS extinguishes rural fire fee proposal
0
Posted: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 2:56 pm
WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS — The Spa City on Monday became the second Greenbrier County municipality to extinguish a proposal for a rural fire fee before a final vote could be conducted.
A rural fire fee ordinance requiring three separate council approvals got the go-ahead during the first reading in White Sulphur in June. The ordinance provided for the imposition of a fee on owners of property located outside the city limits but within the so-called "first due" area — the rural portion of the White Sulphur Springs Volunteer Fire Department's state-mandated fire district.
Prior to Monday evening's city council session, the WSSVFD requested that the governing body "let it (the ordinance) die," citing technical and legal issues with the measure as initially presented. All council members, plus the mayor and recorder, were present at the finance committee meeting where the request was made.
"As it's written, it doesn't work for us in White Sulphur Springs," Mayor Lloyd Haynes said at that finance meeting.
He later explained to the audience attending the council session that the ordinance "in its current form" would not be approved, suggesting that it could be reworked and presented afresh at a later date.
But when the time came to address the agenda item calling for a second reading of the fire fee ordinance, there was a momentary disagreement between the mayor and some council members.
"If you don't have a (motion) or a second, then it dies. Right?" Haynes said.
Council member G.P. Parker questioned the legality of simply not voting, rather than putting the ordinance to a vote on second reading and defeating it outright.
After quietly asking the mayor if the measure would die if a motion were made but failed to gain a second, newly-elected Council member Mark D. Gillespie made a motion to pass the ordinance on second reading, in the apparent expectation that it would die for lack of a second.
Monday, July 13, 2015
Sunday, July 12, 2015
Saturday, July 11, 2015
Friday, July 10, 2015
Thursday, July 9, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)